Welcome to ETC Forums!
|
We are a friendly online community for Yugioh, providing information, spoilers, articles, decks, and many other things. What sets us apart from other boards is that our community actually likes to get to know people, and we want you to be a part of it. We hold lots of contests exclusively for our members, and we always give away booster packs and tins as prizes. I hope your visit today shows you what a great community we have, so join today! |
|
| Guest Message by DevFuse | |
#22
Posted 24 December 2009 - 09:36 PM
Quote
Thats always a worry of mine.
"Did they pick the right Voice Actor." "Do they feel like the character should should how he/she acts." etc. etc.
This post has been edited by Dragonzealot: 24 December 2009 - 10:23 PM
#23
Posted 25 December 2009 - 09:39 PM
ANyone find any cooler stuff? Though as of now Im getting depressed with Square.
#24
Posted 26 December 2009 - 04:56 AM
Very insightful, if excessively lengthy article detailing the first fifteen hours or so of FFXIII. This article has put me back onto the fence, since the author described the characters as a hit and miss with miss being more common and the game being incredibly linear with no option to do side stuff in between story. I may just end up watching a playthrough of it on youtube to save money.
#26
Posted 03 March 2010 - 06:37 PM
#27
Posted 05 March 2010 - 11:12 AM
#28
Posted 05 March 2010 - 11:32 AM
please try to look it up before you just make up things.
UK IGN
Score: 8.3/10
Eurogamer
Score: 8/10
Rpg Site
Score: 8.5/10
Vandal Online
Score: 9.2
Games Radar
Score: 5/5
Game Informer
http://i45.tinypic.com/v3og0i.jpg
http://i49.tinypic.com/2uzw3sm.jpg
Score: 9.25
RPGFan
Score: 85%
The Lost Gamer
Score: 9/10
The Sixth Axis
Score: 8/10
PushSquare
Score: 3/4
Digital Spy
Score: 4/5
Videogamer
Score: 7/10
CVG
Score: 9.2
Britxbox
Score: 7
XBox360 Achievements
Score: 82
Hardgame2
Score: 9.5
Action Button Dot Net
Score: 2/4
Official XBox Magazine
Score: 90
PlayStation Official US Magazine
Score: 5/5
GameMasters UK
Score: 76/100
PSM3 Magazine UK
Score: 70/100
Playstation Official Magazine UK
Score: 9/10
PlayTM UK
http://www.ff-xiii.n...scans/play1.jpg
http://www.ff-xiii.n...scans/play2.jpg
http://www.ff-xiii.n...scans/play3.jpg
Score: 79%
#29
Posted 05 March 2010 - 11:52 AM
This post has been edited by Savior: 05 March 2010 - 11:54 AM
#30
Posted 05 March 2010 - 12:07 PM
Savior, on 05 March 2010 - 11:52 AM, said:
What is the average on Metacritic for most FF games. I just checked them out last night for plums and giggles and they have an 84 right now, which means its still a pretty damn good game.
#31
Posted 05 March 2010 - 12:10 PM
Sora Kitano, on 05 March 2010 - 12:07 PM, said:
Oh, don't get me wrong. I'm still going to buy this, and it's not like I'm saying it sucks.
#32
Posted 05 March 2010 - 12:39 PM
Savior, on 05 March 2010 - 12:10 PM, said:
Eh. Dont take me to seriously when I drop Metacritic scores either. Personally think Metacritic is full of plum for using reviews from randoms as part of their averaging system for metascores.
#33
Posted 05 March 2010 - 04:08 PM

Ira Aeterna :: 5 :: 2\\ Team [ETC] Ira Aeterna 4 :: 2
The Men from Nowhere :: 5 :: 1
ETC Winter Deckbuilding Contest Winner 2010
Trade Thread // References (14)
#34
Posted 05 March 2010 - 04:14 PM
Oh, and the Blues, I got the Blues!
That's me, That's me!
#35
Posted 05 March 2010 - 04:26 PM
Ira Aeternam, on 05 March 2010 - 04:08 PM, said:
Yeah I noticed that when glancing at FF13 on Metacritic. Most of the major and legit reviewers were coming in from 89-96 from what I saw. 88 and lower from the less legit and randoms making reviews.
#36
Posted 05 March 2010 - 04:45 PM

Ira Aeterna :: 5 :: 2\\ Team [ETC] Ira Aeterna 4 :: 2
The Men from Nowhere :: 5 :: 1
ETC Winter Deckbuilding Contest Winner 2010
Trade Thread // References (14)
#37
Posted 05 March 2010 - 05:16 PM
Ira Aeternam, on 05 March 2010 - 04:45 PM, said:
Well the thing that pisses me off about Metacritic is the fact they even use randoms and illegitimate reviewers to start with.
Bioshock is infamous now because of its score of 89, which should have been a 90+ if it wasnt for the grapeing ignorant random that wrote a very bad review on the game.
#38
Posted 05 March 2010 - 08:53 PM
#39
Posted 05 March 2010 - 09:06 PM
Amber R, on 05 March 2010 - 08:53 PM, said:
I noticed some of them are not all that well known which considering the fact I never heard of the vast majority of the reviewers and I dont think many people around here or otherwise have heard of them either.
I dont hold many of them in any regard as they are pretty much the reviewer version of neworange randoms.

Help

Sign In »
Register Now!






















