Jump to content



Welcome to Yu-Gi-Oh! ETC Forums

Welcome to Yu-Gi-Oh! ETC Forums, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Yu-Gi-Oh! ETC Forums by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Breaker the Magical Warrior


  • Please log in to reply
65 replies to this topic

#1 Waffles

Waffles

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 4,244 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:37 PM

Posted Image



Card is RIDICULOUS this format! It loves BW/GB matchups and that's going to make up a huge portion of the meta when the format starts. I'll be maining 3.



Discuss ;0000

#2 Silverstein.

Silverstein.

    I'M MEW SUP

  • Members
  • 10,165 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:39 PM

Card is so broke in Gadgets right now

2007 Most Improved Member Of ETC
Qualified For Nationals 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
1st Roanoke, VA 6-19-10 (7-1)
3rd Charlotte, NC 1-3-09 (8-1)
4th Wilson, NC 5-1-10 (8-1)
7th Wilson, NC 8-21-10 (7-2)
8-3 Nationals 2011, 7-3 Nationals 2009
7-3 YCS Atlanta 2010
James Cory Quick


#3 Fallen

Fallen

    The Rebellion

  • Team ETC
  • 9,696 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:41 PM

Probable told this to a thousand people already but Breaker will be hot this format. A slower format means more people play slower/unchain-able cards which is the type of format this guy capitalizes on. I'm convinced that you could main this guy in any deck currently and have a good amount of success with him.

Posted Image

Spoiler


#4 Waffles

Waffles

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 4,244 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:41 PM

View PostSilverstein., on 26 February 2010 - 09:39 PM, said:

Card is so broke in Gadgets right now


agreed. if i wasn't so bent on using gigantes in my gadget build i'd definitely have 3 in there.


even decks that this card feels awkward in should still be siding a couple.


edit: and i agree with everything xero said.

Edited by Waffles, 26 February 2010 - 09:42 PM.


#5 Silverstein.

Silverstein.

    I'M MEW SUP

  • Members
  • 10,165 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:45 PM

I dont like it in LS though, id rather use Dust Tornado.

2007 Most Improved Member Of ETC
Qualified For Nationals 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
1st Roanoke, VA 6-19-10 (7-1)
3rd Charlotte, NC 1-3-09 (8-1)
4th Wilson, NC 5-1-10 (8-1)
7th Wilson, NC 8-21-10 (7-2)
8-3 Nationals 2011, 7-3 Nationals 2009
7-3 YCS Atlanta 2010
James Cory Quick


#6 Motep-Dragon

Motep-Dragon

    A New Generation

  • Members
  • 1,608 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: California

Posted 26 February 2010 - 10:25 PM

Amazing card is going to be amazing, again. He is good in so many ways and will do amazing in Gadgets this format. Plus, him being at 3 is just grapeing magical.

#7 Dark Riku

Dark Riku

    Way to the Dawn Wielder

  • Members
  • 729 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Dawn

Posted 26 February 2010 - 10:28 PM

Nice card but not a card for every deck.

Its power is no longer so powerful that it has to be limited because of the way the game is now.

#8 Negative One

Negative One

    You're wrong

  • Members
  • 4,667 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Gaming ETC, CT

Posted 27 February 2010 - 07:58 AM

There will be no slower format.

Also, how does this wreck in the GB matchup? Chariot/Bottomless/Book of Moon/run over with Darius/Laquari.
Blackwings maybe, because they don't like to Icarus just one card, but I'd still rather run other cards for this.

Maybe it'll be alright, but it won't be format-defining...
Posted Image

#9 Shadow

Shadow

    CB Radio

  • Hall of Fame
  • 39,004 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Oklahoma

Posted 27 February 2010 - 08:10 AM

View PostZero., on 27 February 2010 - 07:58 AM, said:

There will be no slower format.

Also, how does this wreck in the GB matchup? Chariot/Bottomless/Book of Moon/run over with Darius/Laquari.
Blackwings maybe, because they don't like to Icarus just one card, but I'd still rather run other cards for this.

Maybe it'll be alright, but it won't be format-defining...
Actually, testing with the March 1st list does show signs of a slower paced format.

#10 Tenken

Tenken

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 6,560 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 27 February 2010 - 12:04 PM

It is just the start of the format. We still have new sets, plus people are all most likely still testing.

But, yea I don't see how this wrecks Gb, unless the play summons a GB and ends, in which case 1900 > all. But we all know GBs set backrows, making this a risk shot. Then 1600 is pretty small. Plus chainable spells/traps.

People are hyping gadgets up way too much. Gadgets shouldn't even worry to much about backrows, because the whole point is the opponent can waste all of his spells/traps to kill them, because they just replace themselves. There are times you want to clean off backrow, but you really shouldn't be focusing on it. I would rather have more anti-meta cards (hard to do in an undefined format) than a random beatstick that can clear a backrow.
Yes it can be a nice floater for gadgets, but I wouldn't go for it right off the bat.

#11 namesake

namesake

    because f-zero was a good game

  • Members
  • 5,537 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 27 February 2010 - 12:41 PM

It is a much weaker card this format and it is not as good to use as in the other meta. You need to know what you are doing if you run this in 3. Seems like a good skill card and I see it mained more in stun and it is used in gadgets. If you want to run this at three you need to plan it out. This is an anti-meta tech too. It is not as splashable bottomless trap hole disrupts its play and not everyone runs that many traps. It's a very balanced card. Of course chainables make this hard to use even. Not that great against black wings.

Edited by yugiohquitter, 27 February 2010 - 12:51 PM.


#12 Shadow

Shadow

    CB Radio

  • Hall of Fame
  • 39,004 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Oklahoma

Posted 27 February 2010 - 12:45 PM

I'd almost be happy if someone wasted a BTH on this instead of one of my other key monsters.

It stops Whirlwind and Oppression (which WILL see play). I think that's good enough to consider it.

#13 namesake

namesake

    because f-zero was a good game

  • Members
  • 5,537 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 27 February 2010 - 12:54 PM

They usaully run alot of traps though in blackwings, plus they have chainables. A lot of players run this in the irside deck since it is decent. I made my own strategy though. If bottomless didnt have the priority I would definetly run this to play in a main deck. I kind of miss the days you could destroy bth with breaker's priority. That was when breaker was a very good card since it was instant advanage no matter what deck you played. Not as god as before.

Edited by yugiohquitter, 27 February 2010 - 12:58 PM.


#14 Tenken

Tenken

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 6,560 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 27 February 2010 - 12:58 PM

View Postyugiohquitter, on 27 February 2010 - 12:54 PM, said:

They usaully run alot of traps though in blackwings, plus they have chainables. You can run it in the side deck since it is decent. I made my own strategy though. If bottomless didnt have the priority I would definetly run this to play in a main deck. I kind of miss the days you could destroy bth with breaker's priority.
You mean misplay days?

Whirlwind is at 2. Breaker won't be hitting it often. You can hit Whirlwind and have a useless 1600 floater, or you can attack and risk a Kalut/facedown not killing whirlwind. 1600 is just small right now.

Not saying it is bad, but I don't think I will play it yet/this format.

#15 Apollo

Apollo

    You Can't Handle The Truth

  • Members
  • 11,635 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Massachusetts

Posted 27 February 2010 - 01:08 PM

People have been saying this is better than TKR, which makes no sense to me. Sure, Breaker removes some stuff but he's not that great against Gb's really and he does nothing great vs. Bw that TKR doesn't do. TKR is still a heck of a lot more versatile than Breaker. If I want spell/trap removal I'd rather use cards that don't waste my summon.

Super Smash Brothers
"Bout To Take The World By Storm"

Posted Image


#16 Motep-Dragon

Motep-Dragon

    A New Generation

  • Members
  • 1,608 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: California

Posted 27 February 2010 - 02:33 PM

View PostApollo, on 27 February 2010 - 01:08 PM, said:

People have been saying this is better than TKR, which makes no sense to me. Sure, Breaker removes some stuff but he's not that great against Gb's really and he does nothing great vs. Bw that TKR doesn't do. TKR is still a heck of a lot more versatile than Breaker. If I want spell/trap removal I'd rather use cards that don't waste my summon.
This card would in no way replace Thunder King. Thunder King can actually prevent searching and a special summon. Breaker would be cool in addition, but not as a replacement.

#17 Ice King

Ice King

    Yeah

  • Trading Moderators
  • 11,462 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Knoxville, TN

Posted 27 February 2010 - 09:20 PM

View PostTenken, on 27 February 2010 - 12:04 PM, said:

But, yea I don't see how this wrecks Gb, unless the play summons a GB and ends, in which case 1900 > all. But we all know GBs set backrows, making this a risk shot. Then 1600 is pretty small. Plus chainable spells/traps.
I don't either, esp when GBs can just play the War Chariot upon Breaker's Trigger effect and get it back after tagging in Equeste.


Current Deck: BWs
Trades


#18 Statistic

Statistic

    There can only be one Squall

  • Members
  • 2,053 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: West Frankfort, IL.

Posted 27 February 2010 - 10:48 PM

Breaker is good as a 1900 beatstick and you have to be pretty wise to when you use his effect, that is if he's on the field long enough to make any use of it. I wanted to try him in my Synchro Cat deck sense he's a lvl 4 spellcaster.

Trade List | References[22]


Quote

Statistic says
soo what deck you playing after this fish otk gets banned?

Anime Maniac says
I'll be playing kill Konami deck.
Consists of a lot of bombs and middle fingures.

#19 Waffles

Waffles

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 4,244 posts
  • Gender: Male

Posted 28 February 2010 - 02:28 AM

View PostZero., on 27 February 2010 - 07:58 AM, said:

There will be no slower format.




you realize they hit d-draw, allure, whirlwind, and charge right? the cards that pretty much made the format as fast as it was.

Edited by Waffles, 28 February 2010 - 02:28 AM.


#20 Statistic

Statistic

    There can only be one Squall

  • Members
  • 2,053 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: West Frankfort, IL.

Posted 28 February 2010 - 06:21 AM

View PostWaffles, on 28 February 2010 - 02:28 AM, said:

you realize they hit d-draw, allure, whirlwind, and charge right? the cards that pretty much made the format as fast as it was.
This wont be a slow format if the meta game stays to everyones predictions. Synchro Cat, BWs, GBs, and Lightsworn. It'll be a fast format, not by speed necessarily but by how consistently fast your deck can explode over the other. How I see it being this format for the beginning of it at least. Not sure how Infirnitys will effect the metagame.

Trade List | References[22]


Quote

Statistic says
soo what deck you playing after this fish otk gets banned?

Anime Maniac says
I'll be playing kill Konami deck.
Consists of a lot of bombs and middle fingures.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Powered by Multacom Dedicated Servers