Welcome to Yu-Gi-Oh! ETC Forums
![]() |
Welcome to Yu-Gi-Oh! ETC Forums, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Yu-Gi-Oh! ETC Forums by signing in or creating an account.
|
Back by popular demand...
#1
Posted 03 February 2012 - 02:51 PM
Additionally, our mechanics & rulings section has been moved to become a subform of our gameplay section, so don't think that it's gone away or something.
Power to the players. :)
#2
Posted 03 February 2012 - 03:23 PM
#4
Posted 03 February 2012 - 06:08 PM
Super Smash Brothers
"Bout To Take The World By Storm"

#5
Posted 03 February 2012 - 10:14 PM
lolirony
![]()
#6
Posted 03 February 2012 - 10:37 PM
The problem isn't with the change or non-change. The problem is that the staff never does anything with conviction. They "sort of" try new things, they don't really give the change the support it needs, and it gets abandoned after a 1 month "trial". Proper shifts in the board take time.
Super Smash Brothers
"Bout To Take The World By Storm"

#7
Posted 04 February 2012 - 02:21 AM
Etc can't stick to anything. And they try to appease the few members they have left. The staff needs to grow a pair, make a plan, and stick to it. I understand it is good to look back and see if things areworking out, but this is just another example of Etc caving in.
I like the deck garage. But I was willing to try out the idea. Clearly the staff just handle complaints very well. So again, complain enough, and you will get what you want.
#8
Posted 04 February 2012 - 08:13 AM
"You can't be half a gangster."


Ira Aeterna :: 9 :: 2\\ Team [ETC] Ira Aeterna 4 :: 2
The Men from Nowhere :: 9 :: 1
ETC Winter Deckbuilding Contest Winner 2010
#9
Posted 04 February 2012 - 09:07 AM
Edited by Waffles, 04 February 2012 - 10:56 AM.
#10
Posted 04 February 2012 - 09:13 AM

Cero Oscuras
#11
Posted 04 February 2012 - 09:45 AM
as soon as you get rid of them i will post 20 topics
http://forums.yugioh...hl__BlitzPlayer
Trades:
http://forums.yugioh...g-yugioh-again/
SELLING MY YUGIOH CARDS. AIM ME @ TheCodeMan822
#12
Posted 04 February 2012 - 10:04 AM
Seriously though, there's always going to be conflicting opinions because not only are we more than one person, but as usual, the members don't know what they want, and the staff can't possibly please everyone, which goes back to my 1st point. Along with that, and while I'd still argue that deck garages are an outdated concept that support ineffective discussion & learning, they're also a qualifiier of sorts when it comes to forums like this one, so that's why we brought it back when we did. That's really all it was, so above all else, there's no need to take any of this personally, especially when it comes to attacking the people who happen to disagree with an opinion. That's just being childish.
#13
Posted 04 February 2012 - 05:02 PM
Ira Aeterna, on 04 February 2012 - 08:13 AM, said:
Oh really? Cause the topic in the staff lounge that was posted Jan 25th about this exact topic was almost entirely in favor of this.
If you were against it, you had ample opportunity to let us know
2010 ETC Fantasy Football Champion
2011 ETC Fantasy Football Champion

AIM = PowerCrazy555
#14
Posted 04 February 2012 - 08:04 PM
PowerCrazy, on 04 February 2012 - 05:02 PM, said:
If you were against it, you had ample opportunity to let us know
You all already had my opinion. There was no need for me to be boisterous and disagreeable. This wasn't an attack, so calm down. You are not my enemy.
"You can't be half a gangster."


Ira Aeterna :: 9 :: 2\\ Team [ETC] Ira Aeterna 4 :: 2
The Men from Nowhere :: 9 :: 1
ETC Winter Deckbuilding Contest Winner 2010
#15
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:41 AM
Ira Aeterna, on 04 February 2012 - 08:04 PM, said:
The point of the topic was to gather people's thoughts on re-opening it, so you wouldn't be "boisterous and disagreeable"
Obviously I didn't have your opinion on this until I came in this topic and saw you throwing the rest of the staff under the bus to people bitching about us making a change
2010 ETC Fantasy Football Champion
2011 ETC Fantasy Football Champion

AIM = PowerCrazy555
#16
Posted 05 February 2012 - 08:50 AM
I have not wronged you nor anyone else, nor am I being aggressive, so you need to calm down.
Additionally, I saw no need to reiterate my opinion, seeing as I was a major proponent of the deck section going away and never renounced that opinion. If someone doesn't state that they've changed their mind, it's safest to assume they haven't.
Edited by Ira Aeterna, 05 February 2012 - 08:51 AM.
"You can't be half a gangster."


Ira Aeterna :: 9 :: 2\\ Team [ETC] Ira Aeterna 4 :: 2
The Men from Nowhere :: 9 :: 1
ETC Winter Deckbuilding Contest Winner 2010
#17
Posted 05 February 2012 - 10:52 AM
I just didn't see the point of you having to let the rest of the forum that you were against a decision made by "the staff". It doesn't make us look like a cohesive unit and is slightly disrespectful.
2010 ETC Fantasy Football Champion
2011 ETC Fantasy Football Champion

AIM = PowerCrazy555
#18
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:19 PM
We're individuals. We can work together, but at the end of the day, we all have our own opinions. If someone thinks less of the "staff" because we're all different people, then that's just ridiculous and we're better off without them.
And before you say that we need to "get along to invite new people in etc etc make them think the staff is altogether", DGz explodes with activity and their staff bickers with one another like 14 year olds on their period.
"You can't be half a gangster."


Ira Aeterna :: 9 :: 2\\ Team [ETC] Ira Aeterna 4 :: 2
The Men from Nowhere :: 9 :: 1
ETC Winter Deckbuilding Contest Winner 2010
#19
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:57 PM

Ain't no stopping me at all
You need to saw it off with maybe a chainsaw
And even if that
The crack that I brew is still new
You guys think acute but Cudi is obtuse
#20
Posted 05 February 2012 - 05:10 PM
![]()
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



















